Archive for the ‘Software Reviews’ Category

Windows 7: The Next-Generation XP

Saturday, November 14th, 2009

I have used every Microsoft OS since DOS 5.0 and Windows 3.1. Until now my favorite was Windows 2000. XP was pretty solid (after service pack 2) except for all of the security holes. Every time I would need to fix an XP machine it wasn’t because of something wrong with the OS itself, but because the machine had virus/spyware/trojans etc. Enter Vista. MS fixed most of the security problems but did so at the expense of performance and stability. Now with Windows 7 you get the best of both worlds. XP was released in 2001 and hardware has come a long way since then, but the OS itself remained relatively static and could only take advantage of newer hardware at a basic level. Vista was an improvement and Windows 7 handles it better still.

I think Vista, although I had few problems with it, will go down as ME 2.0. At the same time Windows 7 will be XP 2.0. People will cling to it and MS will have to kill it off before people will move on to it’s next offering, whatever that may be.

With that said I would highly recommend that both XP and Vista users upgrade. Unlike previous upgrades you will actually get better performance and use less resources post-upgrade. A first for MS. Security is rock solid. If XP is swiss cheese, then Win 7 is the wall of China. You no longer have to download the “patch of the day” from Windows Update. I haven’t played around with Media Player, but Media Center is great for watching DVDs and remains pretty much unchanged from Vista. My favorite features are Jump Lists, AERO Snap (for working in two windows side by side). Networking is a bit easier (especially compared to XP). Performance is much improved from Vista and is comparable to or even faster than XP. Calculator, Paint, and Wordpad have been updated. If you are upgrading from Vista you do lose a couple of progams, namely Windows Mail and Photo Gallery. Updated versions can be downloaded from Windows Update for free. The only downside is that upgrading from XP requires a clean install.

As far as the upgrade process itself goes, it’s painless. Just be sure to run the upgrade advisor before you do. All that’s required of you is a product key (at the end of the installation) and activation. So all you have to do is pop the disc in, grab a good book, and before you know it you’re in computing heaven.

Did Microsoft finally get it right?

Saturday, November 14th, 2009

I installed Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit as an upgrade to Windows XP Pro 32-bit. The installation went very smoothly. I used Windows Easy Transfer to transfer my files and settings to a spare hard disk without any problems. I installed Windows 7 64-bit on a new disk leaving my system as a dual-boot: XP or 7. (You get two disks with the family pack upgrade, one for 32-bit and one for 64-bit.) I was able to find 64-bit drivers for all but one device, an older ATI Theatrix 650 TV tuner and video capture card. All other devices either had a driver on the Windows installation disk, or had downloadable drivers available from the manufacturer.

Installation time was a lot faster than XP, though a bit longer if you include the Easy Transfer step. Since it was a new installation, I did have to reload my applications. So far, all of them have run without any problems, even those 32-bit applications that had some issues under XP seem to work flawlessly under 7 (particularly Pinnacle Studio 12). I was pleasantly surprised at how well the Easy Transfer worked. Most of my settings, transferred over to the Windows 7 installation. Even settings for many of my applications.

Impressions:
So far I have to say 7 is a vast improvement over Vista and XP. Microsoft has eliminated or at least greatly improved the many annoying issues with Vista, and has significantly improved the stability and speed compared to XP. The improvement over startup and shutdown times alone would be worth the upgrade. The touch and feel is a nice compromise between old and new. I also like the new library feature of 7. It offers a new simply yet elegant way to organize files.

Although how you get to a lot of operating system tasks have been moved around from where they were in XP, I have had very little trouble figuring out how to do what I used to do in XP. It is actually pretty intuitive. My guess is most people who upgrade from XP to 7 will be very happy. Those who upgrade from Vista will be ecstatic.

I would highly recommend this upgrade for anyone who is stuck using some flavor of Windows. Make sure you use the Upgrade Advisor first so you can check for any problems and download new drivers, particularly if you choose to install the 64-bit version instead of the 32-bit version.

My computer is home built with an Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 on a GIGABYTE GA-EP35C-DS3R mother board w/ 3G memory. My next attempt will be on an older HP dc7600. HP does not have Windows 7 drivers for this model, so we’ll see how well it works.

I bought my copy locally for $150, or $50 per license, a pretty good price for what you get.

Way to go, Microsoft — this could be a hit!

Saturday, November 14th, 2009

I’m happy to say that I am — for the most part — very pleased with this upgrade so far. I came from Vista 32-bit, and I have now officially entered the 64-bit era by installing Windows 7 x64. For quite a few months I read about people’s experiences with the betas and release candidates, and was excited about the good news I kept hearing. I decided to just be patient and put in for my pre-order like most people did, which meant waiting for the October 22nd release date.

Let’s go through this topic by topic:

INSTALLATION: It was easy, almost too easy. For some reason I was half expecting to wait more than an hour to get this on my machine, but instead I was up and running in roughly 25 minutes or so (I performed a clean install, not an upgrade). And on top of that, all of my primary devices were recognized (see the end of my review for complete system specs). The Windows Easy Transfer utility was an enormous help in getting my user identity and files into my new configuration.

USER INTERFACE: Personally I thought Vista was very handsome, what with its transparency, 3-D effects, color schemes, and usability improvements to Windows Explorer, and I believe Windows 7 continues that trend by looking just as sexy — if not more — while at the same time adding its own valuable features and enhancements. It just seems like a great deal of effort was put forth into making everything slick, polished, and logically consistent, and I’ve already fallen in love with many of the additional improvements, such as the revamped and more versatile taskbar, jump lists, and customizable themes. I haven’t yet become accustomed to some features like Aero Shake, but hey, those things are there if I need them. But the attention to detail and even minimalism in certain areas is certainly appreciated. And sure, some people might scoff at the shiny facade and dismiss certain parts of it as being “bells and whistles,” but honestly, isn’t it actually USEFUL to have the ability to see full-screen previews of running applications, or to be able to hide all of your open windows and take a quick glance at what’s underneath? All of these niceties simply add up to a more functional and usable desktop.

PERFORMANCE: I think it’s actually better than Vista. Overall the system feels more responsive and, well, “snappier.” Gaming is as smooth as could be. No complaints as far as startup, shutdown, and resuming from sleep mode are concerned.

STABILITY: Very good, but I’ll give 7 an A- here. I got just ONE blue screen of death so far, and that was during the installation of a particular piece of software (I forget what it was to be honest — maybe a browser plug-in). Other than that, it’s been rock-solid, with absolutely no crashes. I’ve even gone through some software development debugging sessions in which the program I was working on was repeatedly throwing up on me, and Windows 7 recovered gracefully every time.

SOFTWARE COMPATIBILITY: Pretty high marks, but not perfect. I think some of it has to do with my transition to 64-bit anyways, like the fact that I’m having trouble with a specific component in Visual Basic 5 (I use it to support a piece of software I designed for work). No big deal, though — I’m going to circumvent it by using my copy of Windows XP in Sun’s VirtualBox to run it, so problem solved. Another issue I had was the fact that the installation of Samsung Media Studio 5 (for my MP3 player) causes Windows Media Player to fail to launch when you try to open a media file, but again, that’s not a show-stopper because I can manipulate that device directly in the OS anyways without that application. And don’t laugh, but it looks like I might have to give up Publisher 95. Heh heh … yeah, I’ve been using that program for years now to do miscellaneous desktop publishing, but guess what? Its installer is 16-bit. So again, that’s a 64-bit lack of support for 16-bit issue, not really a problem with Windows 7 per se. Plus I guess I could still run it in my virtual XP machine if I wanted to. Other than those snags I just mentioned, the majority of my applications and games run just fine — and thank goodness Cakewalk Music Creator still works with my MIDI and audio interface devices. (I admit I’m still having trouble with this game that I wrote that uses DirectX and has a tendency to start running very slowly, but that might be Nvidia’s fault and not Microsoft’s — and it did the same thing in Vista, too.)

WINDOWS LIVE ESSENTIALS: I guess it was a smart move on behalf of MS. A little less bloat for people who would rather choose alternatives to those programs, but still available as a free download. Personally I feel that Microsoft has been blessed with a lot of talented people who are really experts at design — the basic necessities such as Live Mail and Calendar (and all of the other apps) are wonderful in my opinion.

OTHING THINGS I LIKE: The Devices section in the Control Panel is now much better, and ejecting USB devices is quicker and easier. User switching works flawlessly. I adore the fresh new visual styles of the built-in tools like Paint and WordPad — I’m looking forward to upgrading from Office XP to Office 2010! (Even Calculator is better!)

BUGS OR QUIRKS: The link for opening the backup applet is broken, but not when you launch it via the new Action Center. Also, unlike in Vista, Mozilla Firefox seems to have developed this strange problem of occasionally reporting that it can’t find the server when you try to connect to certain websites — but if you just click the browser’s “back” button, it will then load just fine (and usually sites load properly when you open them via the Bookmarks menu). I don’t perceive it as being severe enough of a problem to make me want to stop using Firefox altogether (yet), but it is kind of annoying. Internet Explorer 8 doesn’t exhibit this behavior at all, so for that reason and others I’m switching back and forth between the two (I tried resetting my router, and it didn’t seem to have any effect).

In summary, I think Microsoft did the right thing by listening to its users and trying to correct Vista’s shortcomings, whether real or just perceived. I can’t say this is a revolution; it’s more like evolution (boy, how many times has THAT been said about a software product?). But to me it’s a step in the right direction, and if things stay the course, Windows could have a bright future.

SYSTEM SPECS: Gigabyte 3D Aurora 570 case | Corsair TX750W PSU | EVGA nForce 780i MOBO | Intel Core 2 Quad (Yorkfield Q9300) | Tuniq Tower 120 CPU cooler | 4 GB Kingston DDR2 800 | HannsG HG281DPB 28″ LCD | BFG Tech GeForce GTX 280 | Western Digital Caviar SE16 500 GB SATA | Samsung DVD+/-RW (SATA) | Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 4 | MOTU FastLane USB MIDI interface | E-MU 0404 USB audio interface | Yamaha YST-M15 speakers | HP Photosmart 8150 printer | HP Scanjet 4070 scanner | D-Link DIR-628 router | Microsoft Natural Keyboard & Optical Mouse | Logitech RumblePad 2 | Windows 7 Home Premium x64

Great for families

Wednesday, November 11th, 2009

Bitdefender Internet Security 2010 is a good choice for a home user who is in need of a easy to use and flexible internet security suite. While it’s not the most powerful suite out there, it has some key advantages that I think make sense for a family where the parents and kids are working on separate computers:

1. It has a three-tiered malware detection process that can detect and isolate new threats more effectively than both the previous version and rival security suites. Like everyone else Bitdefender will detect known malware signatures, and like most security suites it runs unknown programs in a separate “virtual” mode where it closely monitors the program for malware characteristics. Called “B-Have” this virtual mode is slower but it’s mostly impacts they startup of a new program. After the program is cleared it will perform normally. Programs that appear to be malware are quarantined. The last level of protection (new for 2010) is called “Active Virus Control.” Un-trusted programs that make it past the “B-Have” scan are monitored and high-risk program segments are run in a virtual mode for analysis and all the files and memory used by the program are also monitored. This heuristic based detection has always been Bitdefender’s strong suite and it provides very effective protection against undocumented threats. So even if you haven’t downloaded the latest virus signatures you still have pretty effective protection.

2. It’s easy to setup different configuration for different computers, so you can have tight protection on the kids computers while using less cumbersome settings on the parents computer. During setup you’re prompted to choose from some pre-defined user modes that will apply the best settings for a kids computer, a gamer, etc… It also has a custom mode for advanced users.

3. It’s easy to monitor the security status of all your home computers from any one of them, so you’ll know if your kids are ignoring a malware warning or if they’ve been on a phishing page. Using the Network Manager you can remotely monitor, scan, and fix issues with other computers. A red icon on your computer will alert you to trouble on another computer.

4. Handy for both kids and adults, Bitdefender has some of the best scores for phishing protection. It edges out Norton in most tests and significantly out performs Microsoft.

This is not to say the software is perfect. Overall traditional anti-virus protection is merely average. For that you would want Norton or McAfee. It’s also a little more resource hungry that some of its competitors (though not to a significant extent). It has so-so key-logging protection (something I think is less likely to hit a home user). The firewall while effective and particularly robust against attacks has more annoying pop-ups than Norton or McAfee (which do some analysis to determine whether to ask you about a programs internet access before creating a pop-up). The last negative is support. None of the security products out there come with very good support for software conflicts and Bitdefender is no different. Some of the products out there do have decent support for recovering from an attack, but Bitdefender is not one of them (for this kind of support McAfee leads the pack). I honestly wouldn’t get to hung up on the support issue because it’s just a weak spot for most of the software on the market.

Like most of the competition Bitdefender has a top-end product (this one) that comes with some system utilities like disk defrag and file cleanup. These are only modestly useful and not a compelling reason to spend the extra money. However if you think you may want features like a file shredder (destroys all traces of deleted sensitive files) or want an online backup feature then you are are the right buyer for the “Total Security” suite. Most users will be happy without these features and should checkout the less expensive Bitdefender Internet Security suite.

To wrap it up between the great 3 computer 2 year protection and the flexible family friendly features this is easy to recommend for home users. The so-so conventional anti-virus protection and the average firewall makes this a poor choice for a business user with a high email load who might be targeted for hacking (stick with Norton or McAfee and if you have customer data on a computer with internet access higher a pro to evaluate your whole protection system [wireless, router firewall, backups, etc..], it usually just a few hundred bucks and can save you a lot of pain in the case of an attack).

Amazing phone for the price range

Tuesday, November 10th, 2009

This is absolutely amazing phone for the money. It has all the features one can possibly want in a phone. Here are some Pros and Cons. The only reason it did not receive a 5 star review is the lack of commitment from Nokia for the US release of this phone, in terms of firmware updates which are long overdue.

Pros:

-Amazing interface and ease of navigation
-Has great GPS Function. Nokia maps is awesome and for good measure you can get Google maps to work even better with this device.
-Sound is spectacular on the headphones and not too shabby coming from two built in speakers.
-Great array of apps online for use as a work phone or a entertainment phone.
-Great colors and touch screen response.
-Most importantly great sound and connectivity during calls.
-Decent camera not great in the dark.

Cons:

-Nokia doesn’t really care too much about the US market when it comes to this phone. No 3G on T-Mobile and No firmware updates that have been out in other countries for some time now.
-Little buggy and sometimes can freeze and needs a restart. This is why they need to release a US firmware update really badly.
-The dial pad lacks letters that correspond, so if you are calling tech support that has e.g 1-800-WHAT good luck figuring out what WHAT is numerically.
-Battery is kind of lacking but what touch screen isn’t.
-A little thick but not too bad. Other dimensions are perfect in terms of hand grasp for texting and emailing.
-Definitely not a camera phone despite its great Carl Zeiss lens.

Overall:

If you want to put away your ipod and still be able to listen to music, have a good navigation system, be able to SMS/EMail quickly, read Office documents WORD, EXCEL, PPT, PDF on the run, maybe squeeze in a few games, and have a stable OS interface (for most part) this is really a great phone. I forgot to mention it actually is a great cell phone in terms of call quality. I did not want to get the G3 from T-Mobile because I am tired of the commitments and have Google force everything down my throat kind of like Apple has been doing to their customers. This phone has gazillion free apps that are actually useful. You will be able to squeeze a lot of use out of this phone on the cheap and enjoy doing it.